Operation Backlog Completion 2026
Jan 052015
 

Geralt of Rivia is a witcher. A cunning sorcerer. A merciless assassin.

And a cold-blooded killer.

His sole purpose: to destroy the monsters that plague the world.

But not everything monstrous-looking is evil and not everything fair is good. . . and in every fairy tale there is a grain of truth.

When I discussed my most anticipated games of 2015, I brought up the Witcher series, a series I hope to charge through before the third game comes out in May.

Rather than start with The Witcher, I decided to go to the beginning–the book series by Andrzej Sapkowski that inspired the games.

Not all of them have been translated into English (although some have fan translations), but the first has. The Last Wish is a collection of short stories, with chapters of a longer story are interspersed in between. These stories all focus on Geralt of Rivia, and introduce some other notable characters–particularly Dandilion (Dandelion? apparently it’s been translated both ways) and Yennefer.

And the line in the summary about fairy tales is no accident. The Last Wish feels as though it’s set in a dark fairy tale universe (kind of like Fables, I guess). One story has direct ties to Beauty & the Beast. Another contains hints of Snow White. These and many others are twisted and warped, yet they still retain their mythical qualities. Overall, it gives The Last Wish a strange tone I didn’t expect from a Witcher story.

Not that I really knew what to expect. The majority of my time in the Witcher universe so far has been spent with The Witcher Adventure Game, which, while fun, isn’t exactly heavy on lore or story.

Other than that, I enjoyed about an hour of The Witcher, then quit to save it for when I finish the books. So I went into The Last Wish without a lot of expectations… but fairy tales still were a surprise.

The sense of humor was another surprise. People talk about the Witcher series being dark and grim, but these stories had some lighthearted moments–mostly from Dandilion, but Geralt can be quite the Deadpan Snarker.

“I’m to fight the duel because, if I refuse, I’ll be hanged. If I fight, I’m to allow my opponent to injure me because if I wound him, I’ll be put to the rack. What charming alternatives. Maybe I should save you the bother? I’ll thump my head against the pine tree and render myself helpless.”

Hints of fairy tales, occasional humor, intriguing moral points (is there truly such a thing as a “lesser evil”?), and interesting stories made The Last Wish an enjoyable read. The combat scenes were also fun to read, which makes me think I should look to them for inspiration. If you want to check out its style, the first story is included with The Witcher on GOG. (If you got a copy of the game elsewhere, you can redeem it at GOG to get all the bonus goodies like the story.)

Anyway, I liked The Last Wish and recommend it if you like The Witcher, fantasy, or twisted spins on fairy tales. From here on out, we’ll be more in traditional dark fantasy territory territory.

I think.

Dec 222014
 

I don’t read graphic novels or manga very often. I haven’t even read the Ace Attorney manga, an oversight I need to fix. But today I’m going to talk to you about a manga based on a game I praised very highly.

Yes, I’m going to talk about Absolute Zero.

The fantasy counterparts of Hatoful Boyfriend, in Absolute Zero (Anghel's world)

“The forbidden epic of the angel of Judecca”

If you haven’t played Hatoful Boyfriend, you might be very confused right now. Let me explain. While it’s true that Hatoful Boyfriend is a visual novel/dating sim about a human attending a school for gifted birds, it has many other elements.

For example, once you play through several routes, you’ll unlock the ability to pursue Anghel. Anghel has a unique view on life. In his mind, he is a fallen angel, you are Edel Blau, and there’s an evil sorcerer at work… If you’ve played Anghel’s route, you know it plays with fantasy RPG elements, and while it’s technically all explained in the BBL ending, Anghel’s world could easily be considered its own, separate story.

And that’s where this story comes in. Absolute Zero is an official manga by Moa Hato (the creator of Hatoful Boyfriend) and Damurushi, set in the fantasy universe imagined by Anghel.

It starts with the story of Anghel and Edel Blau, but visits several other characters in a collection of stories or chapters (or a “digest of scenes,” as the manga’s intro describes it). It also contains a gallery with information about each of the characters in this alternate universe. Like Anghel’s route, Absolute Zero is a combination of serious fantasy and goofy comedy.

For me the highlight has to be the part when naive alchemist Lute Infini accidentally summons the demon Wallenstein. Wallenstein attempts to make a Mephistopheles-esque pact with him… except Lute is just an adorably clueless dork.

The conversations that ensue are priceless.

Lute Infini (Ryuuji Kawara) and Wallenstein (Shuu Iwamine) in the Absolute Zero manga

Wallenstein may regret this more than Lute…

The only problem with Absolute Zero is that it’s quite short (but also quite cheap, only $1.99 on Amazon). These little snippets of stories are enough to get you interested and leave you wanting more. If there are more Anghel-verse stories out there in English, just point me in the right direction!

Overall, I’d recommend Absolute Zero to anyone who enjoyed Anghel’s route and wants a longer peek at his version of events. It might not mean as much to you if you haven’t played Hatoful Boyfriend–on the other hand, it might just make you more curious about what this game is all about!

By the way, Anghel fans, have you seen the missable Hatoful Boyfriend conversation between Anghel and Nageki? It includes some interesting bits of foreshadowing…

Curious, isn’t it?

Let me know your thoughts on Hatoful Boyfriend, Anghel, and Absolute Zero (and on how adorable Lute/Ryuuji’s cluelessness is) in the comments below! Who else is hoping for a Steam release of Holiday Star?


Buy Absolute Zero at Amazon.

Dec 102014
 

The book cover for Charles Dickens's A Christmas Carol

Even if you’ve never read Charles Dickens’s A Christmas Carol or watched any of its straight movie adaptations, you probably have some familiarity with the story. From use of the name “Scrooge” to describe a stingy or unpleasant person to the dozens of parodies and homages, A Christmas Carol is such a classic there might be more people who know the story without having read the book than there are people who have.

As far as I’m concerned, there’s a reason A Christmas Carol is such a classic. It’s an excellent representation of the Christmas spirit (no pun intended) and repentance. A sour miser who values money above everything (and doesn’t even enjoy it) and never has a kind word for anyone is shown the error of his ways and given a chance to change.

And at the time it was published, it had a strong enough effect on people that donations to charity increased–A Christmas Carol can’t be definitively named the cause, but there’s a good chance it was. If so, it’s also an excellent example of a story that gets a moral point across without sounding preachy or pretentious.

Reading A Christmas Carol for a class on ghosts and hauntings makes me laugh, not because it seems out of place, but because I always think of Ray Bradbury’s “The Exiles,” a short story where the spirits of horror authors are dying as people on Earth burn their now-outlawed books. Charles Dickens is there, and annoyed that he’s been grouped in with the rest of them just because he wrote some ghost stories. (Shakespeare is also present.)

Anyway, back to the topic at hand, A Christmas Carol isn’t as unusual in this lineup of stories as it might first seem. Four ghosts appear across the course of the novel. First, the ghost of Jacob Marley comes to warn his old business partner Ebenezer Scrooge that if he doesn’t change his ways, he’ll be doomed to wander the Earth in torment, as Marley is. Marley appears as a traditional, even cliche ghost, and the book even references it:

A Christmas Carol (1951) - Jacob Marley's ghost

“They were succeeded by a clanking noise, deep down below; as if some person were dragging a heavy chain over the casks in the wine-merchant’s cellar. Scrooge then remembered to have heard that ghosts in haunted houses were described as dragging chains.” (Dickens 13)

(My one criticism of A Christmas Carol is that it’s extremely wordy. A friend once told me Dickens was paid by word, and lines like that make me believe it. Scrooge remembered that he heard that ghosts were described that way? Did we really need all that?)

Of all of the ghosts, Marley is the one most likely to be left out of adaptations, which is a shame, because it’s an excellent scene. It sets the premise for the novel and even contains some moments of humor, such as Scrooge explaining to the ghost why he doesn’t believe in him. Even once Scrooge accepts that it’s real, the two continue to have some entertaining exchanges:

“You will be haunted,” resumed the Ghost, “by Three Spirits.”

Scrooge’s countenance fell almost as low as the Ghost’s had done.

“Is that the chance and hope you mentioned, Jacob?” he demanded, in a faltering voice.

“It is.”

“I–I think I’d rather not,” said Scrooge.

“Without their visits,” said the Ghost, “you cannot hope to shun the path I tread. Expect the first to-morrow, when the bell tolls one.”

“Couldn’t I take ’em all at once, and have it over, Jacob?” (Dickens 18)

The timing of the spirits’ arrival has always confused me, because how Marley says it will happen doesn’t seem to add up with how it’s portrayed in the book–it should take them three nights, yet they get all their visits in on Christmas Eve–but Scrooge basically Hand Waves it by saying spirits can mess with time.

A Christmas Carol (1951) - The Ghost of Christmas yet to Come
All the same, the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come is spooky.

While these three spirits are more famous than Marley, they aren’t traditional ghosts. The Ghost of Christmas Past, the Ghost of Christmas Present, and the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come aren’t the souls of dead people, but rather the embodiments of the different times of Christmas.

And as they literally haunt Scrooge to make him change his nature, they also reveal how much Scrooge is haunted in other ways.

He’s haunted by fear of the world, as revealed in the scene from his past where his wife accuses him of replacing his love of her with a love of money. As the spirits show him things, he’s haunted by the past he lost–all of the good things and happiness he once had that he’s so far from in the present.

My favorite adaptation, 1951’s A Christmas Carol starring Alastair Sim (which is where the pictures I’ve used here come from) goes into even more detail regarding the way Scrooge is haunted by his past, such as devoting more time to the death of his sister. But whether you look at adaptations like that or just the original novel, one thing that a lot of parodies and homages miss is that Scrooge is unhappy. He isn’t the Grinch, taking glee in causing others misfortune. He gets no enjoyment out of anything, and that makes him more haunted than just spending Christmas Eve with ghosts.

Of course, A Christmas Carol ends with Scrooge’s complete repentance. When I first read the book, it was for another class, and our professor asked us if we thought it was realistic that a man could change his life completely–and stick to it–just like that. I say yes.

It wouldn’t be realistic if Scrooge changed just after Marley’s warning. But after seeing the way he used to be, seeing all the happiness he once had, seeing the happiness people still have in the present, and seeing the dismal future that awaits if he remains the way he is?

I believe it.

A Christmas Carol is one of the most famous Christmas stories ever, and I believe it deserves that fame. The wordiness of the narrator can get a bit tiresome, but the core story is as wonderful as ever. If you haven’t already read it, you should… or at least watch one of the excellent adaptations.

(Did I make it through an entire blog post on A Christmas Carol without mentioning Tiny Tim? Madness!)


Works Cited
Dickens, Charles. A Christmas Carol. New York: Bantam, 1843. Print.